<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.smartcompany.com.au/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><!-- generator="Joomla! 1.5 - Open Source Content Management" --><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Business News</title>
		<description>Business news, business advice, business information, entrepreneur interviews, business start-up advice, business blog, business forum, business events and webinars</description>
		<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand-matters.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 08:34:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Joomla! 1.5 - Open Source Content Management</generator>
		<language>en-gb</language>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.smartcompany.com.au/Brand-smartcompany" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="brand-smartcompany" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
			<title>Wipe out</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/wipe-out.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/wipe-out.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><em>In 2008, Billabong was Australia's <a href="http://www.smartcompany.com.au/media/billabong-is-australia-s-hardest-working-brand.html">hardest working brand</a>. Last week, its board sacked long-time Billabong insider and CEO Derek O'Neill, a move that appears to have been in the works for some months.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<author>eschmidl@hotmail.com (Michel Hogan)</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title> You can’t get to WOW from here</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/you-can-t-get-to-wow-from-here.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/you-can-t-get-to-wow-from-here.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><em>I’m pretty much sick and tired of rhetoric from gurus telling companies they need to be WOWing their customers. The fact is most struggle just to satisfy them and until you can do that, WOWing them may as well be Mars. </em></p>
]]></description>
			<author>mhogan@startupsmart.com.au (Michel Hogan )</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 00:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The one thing you can do</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/the-one-thing-you-can-do.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/the-one-thing-you-can-do.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I am often asked, “What’s the one thing I can do?” My return question is most usually, “To do what?” Because it depends.</p>
]]></description>
			<author>mhogan@startupsmart.com.au (Michel Hogan )</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 23:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>A month of living “brandlessly”</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/a-month-of-living-a-brandlesslya.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/a-month-of-living-a-brandlesslya.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I've sworn off using the term "brand" (or even <a href="http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/brand-versus-bob.html">Bob</a> for that matter) for a month. Actually I tweeted my intention last week so in reality I've been doing it for nearly a week now.</p>
]]></description>
			<author>mhogan@startupsmart.com.au (Michel Hogan )</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The world's most "damaged" brands</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/the-most-damaged-brands.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/the-most-damaged-brands.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>An article on 24/7 Wall Street this past week outlined the "<a href="http://247wallst.com/2012/04/13/americas-nine-most-damaged-brands/">Nine Most Damaged Brands in America</a>".</p>
]]></description>
			<author>mhogan@startupsmart.com.au (Michel Hogan )</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>What’s in a name?</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/what-s-in-a-name.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/what-s-in-a-name.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I’m currently working on a naming project for a new enterprise. Confidentiality clauses mean I can’t reveal the details about who they are or what they do.</p>
]]></description>
			<author>andrewmedia@internode.on.net (Michel Hogan)</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 22:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The price of favour</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/the-price-of-favour.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/the-price-of-favour.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>An article in <em>The Age</em> this weekend got me thinking. Called '<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/social-media-clicks-and-business-really-likes-it-20120331-1w5h2.html">Social Media Clicks and Business Really Likes It</a>', there were a couple of points within the article that caught my attention.</p>
]]></description>
			<author>andrewmedia@internode.on.net (Michel Hogan)</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 00:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Shiny Object Syndrome</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/shiny-object-syndrome.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/shiny-object-syndrome.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>A friend described the following scenario to me via email.</p>
]]></description>
			<author>andrewmedia@internode.on.net (Michel Hogan)</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kony 2012: Awareness is great. Now what?</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/kony2012-awareness-is-great-now-what.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/kony2012-awareness-is-great-now-what.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of the Kony 2012 viral video I started thinking about the role of awareness, or more specifically, what happens next.</p>
]]></description>
			<author>andrewmedia@internode.on.net (Michel Hogan)</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Unpaid creative suicide: the case for good design</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/unpaid-creative-suicide-the-case-for-good-design.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/unpaid-creative-suicide-the-case-for-good-design.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Good design matters. It can make you pay attention. It can make you see things differently. It can bring an idea to life in ways that nothing else can. And it IS worth paying for.</p>
]]></description>
			<author>andrewmedia@internode.on.net (Michel Hogan)</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The enemy of clarity is insincerity</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/the-enemy-of-clarity-is-insincerity-or-why-we-don-t-say-what-we-mean.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/the-enemy-of-clarity-is-insincerity-or-why-we-don-t-say-what-we-mean.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>“The enemy of clarity is insincerity” is a great line.  I wish I could claim authorship of it, but it comes paraphrased from a quote by George Orwell:</p>
]]></description>
			<author>andrewmedia@internode.on.net (Michel Hogan)</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>And, not or</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/and-not-or.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/and-not-or.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Amid the wreckage that passes for our national political system I’ve decided to turn my back on its abundant blog gifts and turned my gaze on other matters (at least for this week).</p>
]]></description>
			<author>jthomson@smartcompany.com.au (Michel Hogan)</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dazed and confused amid broken promises</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/dazed-and-confused-amid-broken-promises.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/dazed-and-confused-amid-broken-promises.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It's been such a bad week on promises for corporates here in Australia I'm not even sure where to start. I have noted in the past that "Bobs" are built one action and decision at a time and destroyed the same way. This week we have had two companies give us a real time demonstration of that with ANZ and Air Australia leading the pack in broken promises.</p>
]]></description>
			<author>ekrieger@smartcompany.com.au (Michel Hogan)</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Some words just need a timeout</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/20120214-some-words-just-need-a-timeout.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/20120214-some-words-just-need-a-timeout.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There are words out there that have become empty shells of their former selves; inappropriately used and hackneyed shorthand for not much at all. So that got me thinking, maybe they need a timeout, a holiday or just a bit of well-earned long service leave.</p>
]]></description>
			<author>ekrieger@smartcompany.com.au (Michel Hogan)</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>A good offense is really defense</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/20120207-a-good-offense-is-really-defense.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/20120207-a-good-offense-is-really-defense.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It's been a tough week and at the end of it I have a whole new view of the role of an online presence. It's defense.</p>
]]></description>
			<author>ekrieger@smartcompany.com.au (Michel Hogan)</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Apple launches damage control</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/20120131-apple-s-damage-control.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/20120131-apple-s-damage-control.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Apple is in damage control mode. By now anyone with a computer and an interest in technology and/or Apple have heard about and probably read, the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/26/business/ieconomy-apples-ipad-and-the-human-costs-for-workers-in-china.html?pagewanted=all"><em>New York Times</em> article</a> that started the whole furore.</p>
]]></description>
			<author>ekrieger@smartcompany.com.au (Michel Hogan)</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Satisfied customers and the promises they keep (or don’t)</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/satisfied-customers-and-the-promises-they-keep-or-dona-t.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/satisfied-customers-and-the-promises-they-keep-or-dona-t.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to keeping promises the weight of the discussion mostly falls on the organisation, but what about the other half of the equation – the promises a customer makes?</p>
]]></description>
			<author>mheffernan@smartcompany.com.au (Michel Hogan)</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>I want to know what you think</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/20120117-i-want-to-know-what-you-think.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/20120117-i-want-to-know-what-you-think.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><span>I know many of you are regular readers of this blog and <span>I’ve</span> been lucky enough to meet some of you in person, so <span>I’ve</span> got a question for you. </span></p>
]]></description>
			<author>ekrieger@smartcompany.com.au (Michel Hogan)</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Six ways to build brand resilience</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/20120110-six-ways-to-build-brand-resilience.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/20120110-six-ways-to-build-brand-resilience.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><em>This article first appeared June 7, 2011.</em></p>
<p>There is a lot of talk around these days about sustainability, and it's a term I have used more than once about brands. I was reminded on the weekend, that when I talk about sustainability what I really mean is resilience.</p>
]]></description>
			<author>ekrieger@smartcompany.com.au (Michel Hogan)</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Good brand, bad brand, “rebrand”, you brand</title>
			<link>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/20120103-good-brand-bad-brand-rebrand-you-brand.html</link>
			<guid>http://www.smartcompany.com.au/brand/20120103-good-brand-bad-brand-rebrand-you-brand.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><em>This article first appeared May 10, 2011.</em></p>
<p>This past week saw the launch of <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/travel/blogs/travellers-check/hold-the-front-page-its-sir-richard-20110502-1e3z3.html?posted=successful">Virgin Australia</a><span>.  Complete with Richard <span>Branson</span> on hand, this was touted as the "<span>rebrand</span>"  of Virgin's holdings in this part of the world into a single  identifiable entity. If companies were cattle that may be true. </span></p>
]]></description>
			<author>ekrieger@smartcompany.com.au (Michel Hogan)</author>
			<category>Brand</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 22:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

